Fishman Transducers, Inc. v. Paul

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fishman Transducers, Inc. v. Paul. Read the opinion of the Court — 684 F.3d 187 →

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided July 27, 2012·No. 11-1663·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 11-1663

FISHMAN TRANSDUCERS, INC.,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

STEPHEN PAUL, d/b/a Esteban; DAYSTAR PRODUCTIONS; HSN INTERACTIVE LLC,

Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees. __________

FORCE USA, INC.; FORCE, LTD.,

Third-Party Defendants.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on July 3, 2012, should be

amended as follows.

On page 6, line 6 of 1st paragraph, replace "(section 1125@)"

with "(section 1125(c))".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 11-1663

FISHMAN TRANSDUCERS, INC.,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

STEPHEN PAUL, d/b/a Esteban; DAYSTAR PRODUCTIONS; HSN INTERACTIVE LLC,

Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees. __________

FORCE USA, INC.; FORCE, LTD.,

Third-Party Defendants.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on July 3, 2012, should be

amended as follows.

On page 6, line 6 of 1st paragraph, replace "(section 1125@)"

with "(section 1125(c))".

Fishman Transducers, Inc. v. Paul, (1st Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Fishman Transducers, Inc. v. Paul (Fishman Transducers, Inc. v. Paul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.