Fishkill National Bank v. Light
This text of 119 A.D.2d 796 (Fishkill National Bank v. Light) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action to recover on a guarantee of promissory notes, the defendant Robert Feitlowitz appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Green, J.), dated May 8, 1985, which denied his motion to vacate a default judgment which had been entered against him.
Order affirmed, with costs.
Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant Feitlowitz’s motion to vacate the default judgment against him. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Niehoff, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 A.D.2d 796, 501 N.Y.S.2d 619, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fishkill-national-bank-v-light-nyappdiv-1986.