Fisher v. Zimmer

New York Court of Appeals

Fisher v. Zimmer

134 N.E.2d 681, 1 N.Y.2d 721

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 19, 1956

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 134 N.E.2d 681 (Fisher v. Zimmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. Zimmer, 134 N.E.2d 681, 1 N.Y.2d 721 (N.Y. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed. It has been found as a fact that the parties were mutually mistaken concerning the acreage of this parcel of land. Under the theory on which the action was tried and disposed of this is sufficient to warrant affirmance of the judgment. We pass on no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Wheeler

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed. It has been found as a fact that the parties were mutually mistaken concerning the acreage of this parcel of land. Under the theory on which the action was tried and disposed of this is sufficient to warrant affirmance of the judgment. We pass on no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Conway, Ch. J., Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke and Wheeler

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 N.E.2d 681, 1 N.Y.2d 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-zimmer-ny-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack