Fisher v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Fisher v. United States

50 Cust. Ct. 202, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4084

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 7, 1963

DocketNo. 67420; protest 61/8667 (Buffalo)

StatusPublished

This text of 50 Cust. Ct. 202 (Fisher v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 202, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4084 (cusc 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

[203]*203Opinion by

La whence, J.

It was stipulated that the automobile in question was acquired abroad as an incident of the journey from which the plaintiff was returning. Following United States v. Robert K. Herbst (48 CCPA 145, C.A.D. 781), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, and it was held that the personal exemptions should be applied against the value of said automobile to the extent that said exemptions were otherwise uncharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[203]*203Opinion by

La whence, J.

It was stipulated that the automobile in question was acquired abroad as an incident of the journey from which the plaintiff was returning. Following United States v. Robert K. Herbst (48 CCPA 145, C.A.D. 781), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, and it was held that the personal exemptions should be applied against the value of said automobile to the extent that said exemptions were otherwise uncharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Cust. Ct. 202, 1963 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 4084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-united-states-cusc-1963.