Fisher v. Strickler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Fisher v. Strickler

10 Pa. 348, 1849 Pa. LEXIS 224

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 21, 1849

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Pa. 348 (Fisher v. Strickler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. Strickler, 10 Pa. 348, 1849 Pa. LEXIS 224 (Pa. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

Rosees, J.

After a careful examination of the authorities cited, we concur in the opinion that this is a covenant to stand seised to uses. The judgment is therefore affirmed, for the reasons given by Judge Hayes. We perceive nothing in the contract, as contended, in conflict with the law or policy of this state, either as it affects the collateral inheritance tax, or the dower of any future wife.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosees, J.

After a careful examination of the authorities cited, we concur in the opinion that this is a covenant to stand seised to uses. The judgment is therefore affirmed, for the reasons given by Judge Hayes. We perceive nothing in the contract, as contended, in conflict with the law or policy of this state, either as it affects the collateral inheritance tax, or the dower of any future wife.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Pa. 348, 1849 Pa. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-strickler-pa-1849.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack