Fisher v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Fisher v. State

135 S.W. 564, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 623

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 8, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 135 S.W. 564 (Fisher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. State, 135 S.W. 564, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 623 (Tex. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was tried and convicted at the October term of the district court of Hunt county, being charged with passing a forged instrument.

[565]*565There is neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. The indictment charges the defendant with passing a forged instrument. The charge submits this offense to the jury. In the absence of a statement of facts, the presumption is that the court charged the law applicable to the facts introduced in evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, J.

Appellant was tried and convicted at the October term of the district court of Hunt county, being charged with passing a forged instrument.

[565]*565There is neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. The indictment charges the defendant with passing a forged instrument. The charge submits this offense to the jury. In the absence of a statement of facts, the presumption is that the court charged the law applicable to the facts introduced in evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 S.W. 564, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-state-texcrimapp-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack