Fisher v. State
135 S.W. 564, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 623
Opinion
Appellant was tried and convicted at the October term of the district court of Hunt county, being charged with passing a forged instrument.
[565] There is neither a statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. The indictment charges the defendant with passing a forged instrument. The charge submits this offense to the jury. In the absence of a statement of facts, the presumption is that the court charged the law applicable to the facts introduced in evidence.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fisher v. State, 135 S.W. 564, 1911 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 623 (Tex. 1911).
135 S.W. 564 (Fisher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Eaton
252 S.W.2d 557 (Texas Supreme Court, 1952)