Fisher v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fisher v. State

454 S.W.3d 378, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 107, 2015 WL 427829

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 3, 2015·No. WD 77390·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Randy Fisher appeals from the denial of his Rule' 29.15 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Randy Fisher appeals from the denial of his Rule' 29.15 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. A formal, published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Fisher v. State, 454 S.W.3d 378, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 107, 2015 WL 427829 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

454 S.W.3d 378 (Fisher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.