Fisher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fisher v. State

638 So. 2d 196, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5936, 1994 WL 264929

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 17, 1994

DocketNo. 93-1683

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 638 So. 2d 196 (Fisher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. State, 638 So. 2d 196, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5936, 1994 WL 264929 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the state’s concession of error in this ease, we reverse the judgment holding Fisher in direct criminal contempt. The state agreed the trial judge failed to comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 specifically because it failed to include in its judgment “a recital of those facts on which adjudication of guilt is based prior to [197]*197the adjudication of guilt ..which is mandated by the rule.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP, GRIFFIN, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on the state’s concession of error in this ease, we reverse the judgment holding Fisher in direct criminal contempt. The state agreed the trial judge failed to comply with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830 specifically because it failed to include in its judgment “a recital of those facts on which adjudication of guilt is based prior to [197]*197the adjudication of guilt ..which is mandated by the rule.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

W. SHARP, GRIFFIN, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

638 So. 2d 196, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5936, 1994 WL 264929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack