Fisher v. State
493 So. 2d 554, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1945, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 11, 1986·No. No. BF-496·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Fisher appeals, contending the trial court imposed an illegal sentence because it is in violation of section 948.01(8), Florida Statutes (1983), under the rationale of Easton v. State, 472 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). This court recently rejected the reasoning of Easton in Pittman v. State, 492 So.2d 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). Accordingly, we are compelled to AFFIRM.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fisher v. State, 493 So. 2d 554, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1945, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9626 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
493 So. 2d 554 (Fisher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Heuring v. State
559 So. 2d 207 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Heuring v. State
539 So. 2d 590 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)