Fisher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fisher v. State

224 So. 2d 415, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5531

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 19, 1969

DocketNo. L-105

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 224 So. 2d 415 (Fisher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. State, 224 So. 2d 415, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5531 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree with a recommendation of mercy. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

Although there is evidence in the record to support appellant’s theory of innocence, there is likewise competent and substantial evidence by eyewitnesses to the crime and appellant’s own confession made shortly thereafter to support the jury’s verdict. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. The credibility of the testimony and the weight of the evidence are peculiarly jury questions to be decided by the trier of the facts. The findings by the jury will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous. We have considered the remaining points on appeal but find them to be without substantial merit. The judgment appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree with a recommendation of mercy. The principal question preserved on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the judgment.

Although there is evidence in the record to support appellant’s theory of innocence, there is likewise competent and substantial evidence by eyewitnesses to the crime and appellant’s own confession made shortly thereafter to support the jury’s verdict. It is not the province of this court to substitute its judgment for that of the trier of the facts. The credibility of the testimony and the weight of the evidence are peculiarly jury questions to be decided by the trier of the facts. The findings by the jury will not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing that the evidence demonstrates that the conclusions reached are erroneous. We have considered the remaining points on appeal but find them to be without substantial merit. The judgment appealed is affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 So. 2d 415, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-state-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack