Fisher v. State Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fisher v. State Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security

333 So. 2d 513, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15165

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 18, 1976

DocketNo. 76-210

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 333 So. 2d 513 (Fisher v. State Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. State Department of Commerce, Division of Employment Security, 333 So. 2d 513, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15165 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon due consideration of the briefs and record we are of the opinion that the termination of petitioner’s employment was because of nonavailability of work at the expiration of her approved maternity leave; therefore petitioner did not voluntarily leave her employment without good cause attributable to her employer thus entitling her to receive unemployment benefits. See Robinson v. Industrial Relations Commission, Fla.App., 329 So.2d 401, opinion filed March 26, 1976. This court’s recent decision in Robinson, supra, involved a situation markedly similar to the instant case and we are of the opinion that the rationale and conclusion in Robinson is applicable here. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari addressed to the decision of the Industrial Relations Commission (denying petitioner’s claim for unemployment compensation) is granted and the order under review is quashed and the cause remanded with directions to grant petitioner unemployment compensation benefits.

CERTIORARI GRANTED.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon due consideration of the briefs and record we are of the opinion that the termination of petitioner’s employment was because of nonavailability of work at the expiration of her approved maternity leave; therefore petitioner did not voluntarily leave her employment without good cause attributable to her employer thus entitling her to receive unemployment benefits. See Robinson v. Industrial Relations Commission, Fla.App., 329 So.2d 401, opinion filed March 26, 1976. This court’s recent decision in Robinson, supra, involved a situation markedly similar to the instant case and we are of the opinion that the rationale and conclusion in Robinson is applicable here. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari addressed to the decision of the Industrial Relations Commission (denying petitioner’s claim for unemployment compensation) is granted and the order under review is quashed and the cause remanded with directions to grant petitioner unemployment compensation benefits.

CERTIORARI GRANTED.

WALDEN, C. J., and CROSS and MA-GER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

333 So. 2d 513, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-state-department-of-commerce-division-of-employment-security-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack