Fisher v. Ronemus

120 A. 775, 277 Pa. 164, 1923 Pa. LEXIS 385
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 9, 1923·No. Appeal, No. 289·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This case was tried by the court below without a jury, under the Act of April 22, 1874, P. L. 35. Judgment was entered for defendants and plaintiffs have appealed.

The details of the case appear in Fisher et al. v. Ronemus et al., 267 Pa. 325, where we removed a nonsuit because, as we there held, plaintiff was entitled to prove the facts stated in an offer of evidence which the court below declined to receive. When the case came to trial the second time, however, plaintiff failed to sustain his offer, and the court below, on the proofs presented, concluded defendants were entitled to judgment. In this we see no error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. Ronemus, 120 A. 775, 277 Pa. 164, 1923 Pa. LEXIS 385 (Pa. 1923).

120 A. 775 (Fisher v. Ronemus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Davidson
83 Pa. Super. 79 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)