Fisher v. Roling
This text of 142 S.W.3d 836 (Fisher v. Roling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, Steve Roling, Director, Missouri Department of Social Services, Division of Medical Services (Division), appeals from the judgment of the trial court declaring that the Division’s actions in suspending or terminating the State of Missouri’s Medicaid adult eyeglasses service, by emergency rule and other non-statutory means, violated section 208.152.1(15) RSMo 2000 and permanently enjoining the Division from re-enacting an emergency rule or implementing a non-statutory policy to suspend or eliminate Missouri’s Medicaid adult eyeglasses program.
Today, this court affirms the judgment in a companion case, Seveller McNeil-Terry v. Roling, ED 83731, 142 S.W.3d 828, 2004 WL 1440241 (MoApp. E.D. June 29, 2004), which involves similar issues but addresses Missouri’s Medicaid adult dental services program. The analysis set forth in Seveller McNeil-Terry applies to this case. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in Seveller McNeil-Terry the judgment is affirmed.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
142 S.W.3d 836, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 966, 2004 WL 1440278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-roling-moctapp-2004.