Fisher v. Ripley

Washington Supreme Court

Fisher v. Ripley

167 P. 1183, 98 Wash. 696, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 984

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 29, 1917

DocketNo. 14163

StatusPublished

This text of 167 P. 1183 (Fisher v. Ripley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. Ripley, 167 P. 1183, 98 Wash. 696, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 984 (Wash. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question we deem of importance in this case is whether the findings of fact made by the lower court are sustained hy the evidence.

It will he of no value to review or discuss the evidence at length. We have read the record, and while there is considerable conflict in the testimony, we are of the opinion that the findings of fact entered hy the lower court are sustained hy a fair preponderance of the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only question we deem of importance in this case is whether the findings of fact made by the lower court are sustained hy the evidence.

It will he of no value to review or discuss the evidence at length. We have read the record, and while there is considerable conflict in the testimony, we are of the opinion that the findings of fact entered hy the lower court are sustained hy a fair preponderance of the evidence.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 P. 1183, 98 Wash. 696, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-ripley-wash-1917.