Fisher v. Phoenix Assurance Co. of London
134 A. 861, 103 N.J.L. 184, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 281
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Jess in the court below.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fisher v. Phoenix Assurance Co. of London, 134 A. 861, 103 N.J.L. 184, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 281 (N.J. 1926).
134 A. 861 (Fisher v. Phoenix Assurance Co. of London) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ekelchik v. American Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa.
152 A.2d 156 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1959)