Fisher v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.
This text of Fisher v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc. (Fisher v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | TODD FISHER, Case No. 1:18-cv-01392-NONE-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR 13 v. DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 14 | OSMOSE UTILITIES SERVICES, INC., 15 Defendant. (ECF No. 21) 16 17 Plaintiff, Todd Fisher, and Defendant, Osmose Utilities Services, Inc., have filed a 18 | stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 21). In light of the stipulation, 19 | the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A); Wilson v. 20 | City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is 21 | respectfully directed to close this case. 22 T IS SO ORDERED. 23 24] Dated: _ April 8, 2020 [spe ey — 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fisher v. Osmose Utilities Services, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-osmose-utilities-services-inc-caed-2020.