Fisher v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fisher v. Moore

789 So. 2d 431, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8307, 2001 WL 686804

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 20, 2001

DocketNo. 4D01-1262

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 789 So. 2d 431 (Fisher v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. Moore, 789 So. 2d 431, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8307, 2001 WL 686804 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Michael Fisher seeks certiorari review of the circuit court order that dismissed his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He claims that the Department of Corrections and the Florida Parole Commission improperly structured the consecutive sentences in his two cases, resulting in his conditional release term for the first crime being served at the end of both consecutive prison sentences. The circuit court found that Fisher had failed to show that he had exhausted his administrative remedies and dismissed the petition without prejudice to do so.

Fisher asks that he be excused from the exhaustion requirement, but he does not offer any legally cognizable reason why. Due to this unexcused failure to exhaust administrative remedies, the circuit court properly dismissed his habeas petition without prejudice to seek administrative relief. See Moore v. Dugger, 613 So.2d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We deny the petition for writ of certiorari without prejudice to Fisher pursuing administrative relief, and if necessary to seek judicial review in the circuit court after all available administrative remedies have been exhausted.

WARNER, C.J., DELL and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Michael Fisher seeks certiorari review of the circuit court order that dismissed his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He claims that the Department of Corrections and the Florida Parole Commission improperly structured the consecutive sentences in his two cases, resulting in his conditional release term for the first crime being served at the end of both consecutive prison sentences. The circuit court found that Fisher had failed to show that he had exhausted his administrative remedies and dismissed the petition without prejudice to do so.

Fisher asks that he be excused from the exhaustion requirement, but he does not offer any legally cognizable reason why. Due to this unexcused failure to exhaust administrative remedies, the circuit court properly dismissed his habeas petition without prejudice to seek administrative relief. See Moore v. Dugger, 613 So.2d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We deny the petition for writ of certiorari without prejudice to Fisher pursuing administrative relief, and if necessary to seek judicial review in the circuit court after all available administrative remedies have been exhausted.

WARNER, C.J., DELL and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

789 So. 2d 431, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8307, 2001 WL 686804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-moore-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack