Fisher v. Moore

789 So. 2d 431, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8307, 2001 WL 686804
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 2001·No. No. 4D01-1262·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Patrick Michael Fisher seeks certiorari review of the circuit court order that dismissed his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He claims that the Department of Corrections and the Florida Parole Commission improperly structured the consecutive sentences in his two cases, resulting in his conditional release term for the first crime being served at the end of both consecutive prison sentences. The circuit court found that Fisher had failed to show that he had exhausted his administrative remedies and dismissed the petition without prejudice to do so.

Fisher asks that he be excused from the exhaustion requirement, but he does not offer any legally cognizable reason why. Due to this unexcused failure to exhaust administrative remedies, the circuit court properly dismissed his habeas petition without prejudice to seek administrative relief. See Moore v. Dugger, 613 So.2d 571 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). We deny the petition for writ of certiorari without prejudice to Fisher pursuing administrative relief, and if necessary to seek judicial review in the circuit court after all available administrative remedies have been exhausted.

WARNER, C.J., DELL and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. Moore, 789 So. 2d 431, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8307, 2001 WL 686804 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

789 So. 2d 431 (Fisher v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
943 So. 2d 975 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)