Fisher v. McDuff
This text of 172 So. 637 (Fisher v. McDuff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a decree dissolving a temporary injunction “restraining and enjoining the said Fred H. McDuff, as Sheriff of Jefferson County, from in anywise interfering or molesting the complainant in the operation of his business or molesting or interfering in any way with the mint vending machines described in the bill of complaint,” and dismissing the bill as last amended.
The phase of this case, as to pleading required to bring the case within the exception expressly declared by section 2 of the statute (Gen. Acts 1931, p. 807, § 2), is disposed of in Higdon v. Fred H. McDuff, as Sheriff, ante, p. 497, 172 So. 636.
When all the pleadings and the respective affidavits on which the submission was had are considered, we are of opinion that the decree of the trial court dissolving the temporary injunction and dismissing the bill of complaint as last amended was not in error.
The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 So. 637, 233 Ala. 499, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-mcduff-ala-1937.