Fisher v. Longhitano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fisher v. Longhitano

123 A.D.2d 739, 507 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60882

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 123 A.D.2d 739 (Fisher v. Longhitano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. Longhitano, 123 A.D.2d 739, 507 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a judgment declaring that a certain plot of land was illegally subdivided and that the defendant Longhitano’s parcel is not a conforming buildable lot, the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated October 15, 1985, as granted summary judgment to the defendants dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The instant action is barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations. Special Term’s award of summary judgment to the defendants was, therefore, proper (CPLR 3211 [a] [5]). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a judgment declaring that a certain plot of land was illegally subdivided and that the defendant Longhitano’s parcel is not a conforming buildable lot, the plaintiff appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated October 15, 1985, as granted summary judgment to the defendants dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The instant action is barred by the applicable Statute of Limitations. Special Term’s award of summary judgment to the defendants was, therefore, proper (CPLR 3211 [a] [5]). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Bracken and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.2d 739, 507 N.Y.S.2d 604, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 60882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-longhitano-nyappdiv-1986.