Fisher v. Lane

10 N.W. 678, 57 Iowa 334
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedDecember 12, 1881
StatusPublished

This text of 10 N.W. 678 (Fisher v. Lane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fisher v. Lane, 10 N.W. 678, 57 Iowa 334 (iowa 1881).

Opinion

Rothrock, J.

controversy: practice. The validity of the promissory note and mortgage upon which the suit was brought was admitted. But the defendant averred an offer in writing to pay the amount due before the commencement of the suit. The effect of this offer appears to have been [335]*335the matter in controversy in the court below. The defendant claimed that the offer was equivalent to a tender, and stopped the interest, and defeated the recovery of an attorney’s fee which was provided for in the note and mortgage.

As the interest in controversy and attorney’s fee allowed by the court are in the aggregate less than one hundred dollars, no appeal can be entertained without the certificate required by section 3173 of the Code. There being no such certificate, the appeal must be

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.W. 678, 57 Iowa 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-lane-iowa-1881.