Fisher v. Kutztown Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Fisher v. Kutztown Savings Bank

3 Walker 477

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 15, 1883

DocketNo. 276

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Walker 477 (Fisher v. Kutztown Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher v. Kutztown Savings Bank, 3 Walker 477 (Pa. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supremo Court affirmed the judgment of the Common Pleas on March 12,1833, in the following opinion,

Per Curiam :

The facts found by the learned judge under the reference fully vindicate his conclusions of law. The corporation had .an undoubted right to loan money. Talcing thisnote to secure the return of the money loaned on the endorsement of the plaintiff in error is not in violation of its corporate powers. The excess of interest was property disallowed, and judgment was correctly entered for the residue of the claim.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supremo Court affirmed the judgment of the Common Pleas on March 12,1833, in the following opinion,

Per Curiam :

The facts found by the learned judge under the reference fully vindicate his conclusions of law. The corporation had .an undoubted right to loan money. Talcing thisnote to secure the return of the money loaned on the endorsement of the plaintiff in error is not in violation of its corporate powers. The excess of interest was property disallowed, and judgment was correctly entered for the residue of the claim.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Walker 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-kutztown-savings-bank-pa-1883.