Fisher v. Kansas City Humboldt Mining Co.

30 Colo. 220
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided April 15, 1902·No. No. 3812·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As Mr. Jnstice Gabbert was disqualified to sit in this cause, it was heard by the Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Steele. The former thinks the judgment should be reversed, the latter that it should be affirmed. Section 403 of the Civil Code provides that whenever the supreme court shall be equally divided in opinion, on hearing an appeal or writ of error, the judgment of the court below shall stand affirmed.

No useful purpose would be subserved by discussing the questions involved, and no opinion will be filed.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Mr. Justice Gabbert not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. Kansas City Humboldt Mining Co., 30 Colo. 220 (Colo. 1902).

30 Colo. 220 (Fisher v. Kansas City Humboldt Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baden Baden Gold Mining Co. v. Jose
20 Colo. App. 260 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1904)