Fisher v. Jim Lupient Auto Mall

904 N.W.2d 447
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided November 8, 2017·No. A17-0460·Published

Opinions

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed March 1, 2017, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that “[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view,” doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Margaret H. Chutich Margaret H. Chutich, Associate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. Jim Lupient Auto Mall, 904 N.W.2d 447 (Mich. 2017).

904 N.W.2d 447 (Fisher v. Jim Lupient Auto Mall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)
Tambornino v. Health Risk Management
787 N.W.2d 540 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 2010)