Fisher v. Hyland
This text of 22 La. Ann. 31 (Fisher v. Hyland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This suit was instituted to recover a sum of money alleged to have been unduly paid bjr or in behalf of plaintiff to defendant. We do not deem it necessary to state the voluminous and conflicting testimony which is to be found in the record. It appears to, liave been established to the satisfaction of the jury before whom the-cause was tried, and of the judge a qiio, who refused a new trial, that the claim of the plaintiff was well founded, and we are not prepared to say that the judgment thus rendered is manifestly erroneous. Denaule v. Nunez, 6 L. 31; Orleans Nav. Co. v. Allard, 6 L. 492.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be affirmed,, with costs.
Rehearing refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 La. Ann. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-hyland-la-1870.