Fisher v. Hyde

3 Yeates 256
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1801·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The court said, they well recollected the circumstances disclosed in Nixon v. Young; and unless it clearly appeared, that the courts of New York paid regard to discharges under our bankrupt and insolvent laws, they declared that on principles of reciprocity, they could not respect discharges under their laws. At the instance of the defendant’s counsel, they gave further time to make inquiries as to this point.

The argument being resumed this term, and it being admitted, that by the practice of the courts in New York, no regard was paid to certificates of bankruptcy under the laws of Pennsylvania, the court discharged the rule, and directed that the defendant should give bail.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. Hyde, 3 Yeates 256 (Pa. 1801).

3 Yeates 256 (Fisher v. Hyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heinrich Mette & Co. v. Walter S. Schell, Inc.
39 Pa. D. & C. 482 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1940)