Fisher v. Hudson Hall LLC
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff, -against- 22 CIVIL 9737 (DEH) JUDGMENT HUDSON HALL LLC, et al., Defendants. wane
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated June 21, 2024, Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Count I is dismissed with prejudice. See Romero v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 21 Civ. 4951, 2022 WL 624451, at *6 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2022) (“Because the FLSA claim is barred by the statute of limitations, it will be dismissed with prejudice.”). As noted, the Court has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Count II, which is dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York June 24, 2024 DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court BY: K MANGO Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fisher v. Hudson Hall LLC (Fisher v. Hudson Hall LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.