Fisher v. Hochenhull
This text of 117 S.E. 249 (Fisher v. Hochenhull) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action for land. The plaintiff .prevailed, and the defendant made a motion for a new trial,' based on the general grounds, and three amendments thereto, complaining of excerpts from the charge of the court. The motion for new trial was overruled, and the defendant excepted. Held: The verdict was supported by evidence, and none of the grounds of the motion require the grant of a new trial. The excerpts from the charge of the court, of which complaint is made, are not entirely free from verbal inaccuracies, but such inaccuracies do not require a reversal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
117 S.E. 249, 155 Ga. 487, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-hochenhull-ga-1923.