Fisher v. Hill

7 Mass. 86
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1810·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

There can be no question but that this devise lapsed at the common law, by the death of the devisee before that of the testator. Our statute, of 1783, c. 24, § 8, only saves the devise, where the devisee dies leaving lineal descendants, who [74]*74“ shall take the estate devised, in the same way and manner such devisee would have done in case he had survived the testator.” Such descendants are purchasers, and take by a sort of statute devise. But the devisee, in the case at bar, left no lineal descendants. The case is, therefore, not within the statute; and the demandant is of course entitled, as an heir at law of the testator, to the part of the estate he demands in his writ.

Tenant defaulted

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. Hill, 7 Mass. 86 (Mass. 1810).

7 Mass. 86 (Fisher v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lee v. Gay
29 N.E. 632 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)
Rivenett v. Bourquin
18 N.W. 537 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)
Estate of Pfuelb
1 Myrick 38 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1873)
Ballard v. Ballard
35 Mass. 41 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1836)