Fisher v. Hill
This text of 7 Mass. 86 (Fisher v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There can be no question but that this devise lapsed at the common law, by the death of the devisee before that of the testator. Our statute, of 1783, c. 24, § 8, only saves the devise, where the devisee dies leaving lineal descendants, who [74]*74“ shall take the estate devised, in the same way and manner such devisee would have done in case he had survived the testator.” Such descendants are purchasers, and take by a sort of statute devise. But the devisee, in the case at bar, left no lineal descendants. The case is, therefore, not within the statute; and the demandant is of course entitled, as an heir at law of the testator, to the part of the estate he demands in his writ.
Tenant defaulted
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Mass. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-hill-mass-1810.