Fisher v. Hasenjager

858 N.E.2d 816, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1404
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 13, 2006·No. 2006-1853·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mercer App. No. 10-05-14, 2006-Ohio-4190. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed September 27, 2006:

[1405]*1405“Is a change in the designation of residential parent and legal custodian of children a ’term’ of a court approved shared parenting decree, allowing the designation to be modified solely on a finding that the modification is in the best interest of the children pursuant to R.C. 3109.04(E)(2)(b) and without a determination that a ’change in circumstances’ has occurred pursuant to R.C. 3109.04(E)(1)(a)?”

The conflict cases are Sckoettle v. Bering (Apr. 22,1996), Brown App. No. CA95-07-011, and Fisher v. Campbell (June 23,1997), Butler App. No. CA96-11-248.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-1815, Fisher v. Hasenjager, Mercer App. No. 10-05-14, 2006-Ohio-4190.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. Hasenjager, 858 N.E.2d 816, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1404 (Ohio 2006).

858 N.E.2d 816 (Fisher v. Hasenjager) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adkins v. Grant, Ca2007-01-001 (8-13-2007)
2007 Ohio 4115 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Pedraza v. Collier, 7-06-03 (7-30-2007)
2007 Ohio 3835 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)