Fisher v. Fuyao Glass America Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided March 18, 2020·No. 3:18-cv-00405·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON EBONE FISHER : CASE NO. 3:18cv405 Plaintiffs, : JUDGE WALTER H. RICE v. : FUYAO GLASS AMERICA INC. Defendant. SSS ORDER OF DISMISSAL; TERMINATION ENTRY □□ □□□ SSS The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated. Parties intending to preserve this Court’s jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. Fuyao Glass America Inc., (S.D. Ohio 2020).

Fisher v. Fuyao Glass America Inc. (Fisher v. Fuyao Glass America Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
511 U.S. 375 (Supreme Court, 1994)