Fisher v. Foss

30 Me. 459
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 30 Me. 459 (Fisher v. Foss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fisher v. Foss, 30 Me. 459 (Me. 1849).

Opinion

Tenney, J. orally.

— The indorsement of the writ is unobjectionable. It would hold the persons composing the copartnership.

The judgment was rendered after the petition, but before 'the decree in bankruptcy. It is contended by the defendant’s counsel, that therefore it was provable in bankruptcy, and is of course barred by the decree. But such is not the opinion of the Court. Because the judgment became a new debt after the filing of the petition, the suit is not barred by the discharge.

There is a motion to stay proceedings, and a case from New York Reports is cited. But the doctrine of that case is not applicable to this. Judgment for the plaintiffs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilman v. Cate
63 N.H. 278 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1884)
McCarthy v. Goodwin
8 Mo. App. 380 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1880)
In re Gallison
9 F. Cas. 1109 (D. Massachusetts, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Me. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-foss-me-1849.