Fisher v. Fisher

232 S.E.2d 532, 238 Ga. 253, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 978
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 27, 1977
Docket31719
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 232 S.E.2d 532 (Fisher v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fisher v. Fisher, 232 S.E.2d 532, 238 Ga. 253, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 978 (Ga. 1977).

Opinion

Jordan, Justice.

Appellant sued appellee for divorce, alimony and child support. In the suit, she sought to set aside a conveyance by appellee to G. Mason, of the marital home, an automobile, and $3,000.00 in cash on the ground that the conveyances were made with the intent to defraud her with respect to her claim for alimony. The jury granted the divorce; canceled the conveyance of the automobile and awarded it to the appellant; canceled the deed to the home and awarded the furnishings and a 50% undivided interest in the home to appellant; and awarded periodic alimony.

Appellant appeals the denial of her motion for a new trial.

Her motion for new trial recited three claimed errors. Two of the- enumerated errors complain of a recharge given to the jury. No objection to this recharge was made before the verdict was returned, and therefore it was not error to deny the motion for a new trial on these grounds. Code Ann. § 70-207 (a). The exception found in Code. Ann. § 70-207 (c) is inapplicable to this case.

The remaining enumeration of error alleged that the trial court improperly restricted appellant’s attorney from informing the jury in closing argument that if they set aside the deed, but failed to award the entire interest to the appellant, then the remaining interest would stay [254]*254in the grantee. The court made this fact clear to the jury in its recharge, and we fail to see how the appellant was prejudiced by the actions of the trial court.

Submitted November 19, 1976 — Decided January 27, 1977. Adams, O’Neal, Hemingway, Kaplan, Stone & Brown, Kice H. Stone, Randall C. Sorenson, for appellant. Stanley Earl Fisher, Sr., Geneva B. Mason, pro se.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrison v. State
526 S.E.2d 336 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2000)
Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Reed
242 S.E.2d 731 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 S.E.2d 532, 238 Ga. 253, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-fisher-ga-1977.