Fisher v. District of Columbia

511 A.2d 28, 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 374
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided June 19, 1986·No. No. 84-896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellees’ petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division *, that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of August 29, 1985, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before June 30, 1986.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. District of Columbia, 511 A.2d 28, 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 374 (D.C. 1986).

511 A.2d 28 (Fisher v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Hodges
681 A.2d 1102 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)