Fisher v. District of Columbia

511 A.2d 28, 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 374
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 19, 1986
DocketNo. 84-896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 511 A.2d 28 (Fisher v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fisher v. District of Columbia, 511 A.2d 28, 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 374 (D.C. 1986).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellees’ petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division *, that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

FURTHER ORDERED that appellees’ petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of August 29, 1985, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before June 30, 1986.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Hodges
681 A.2d 1102 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
511 A.2d 28, 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-district-of-columbia-dc-1986.