Fisher v. Davis

493 N.E.2d 1323, 1986 Ind. App. LEXIS 2720
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fisher v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1986 Ind. App. LEXIS 2306
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided June 25, 1986·No. No. 3-984A243·Published

Opinion

OPINION ON REHEARING

GARRARD, Judge.

Appellee's petition for rehearing asserts, inter alia, uncertainty as to the procedure available to the court on remand following our decision of February 11, 1986, 488 N.E.2d 725.

Our opinion did not dispute the authority of the trial court sua sponte to raise errors occurring at trial and to grant appropriate relief thereon.

The ground of reversal was the court's failure to give notice of the proposed grounds for granting relief to the parties affected and then affording them the opportunity to be heard thereon.

Upon remand the court upon providing such notice and hearing may proceed to hear and determine the questions thus presented.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

HOFFMAN, J., concurs. STATON, P.J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. Davis, 493 N.E.2d 1323, 1986 Ind. App. LEXIS 2720 (Ind. Ct. App. 1986).

493 N.E.2d 1323 (Fisher v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fisher v. Davis
488 N.E.2d 725 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1986)