Fisher v. Dadeland National Bank
This text of 489 So. 2d 1239 (Fisher v. Dadeland National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contrary to the trial court’s implicit determination, the filing of the sheriffs return of service of process is record activity sufficient to preclude dismissal, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(e), for failure to prosecute. Sittser v. General Motors Corp., 488 So.2d 577 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Hale v. Hart Properties, Inc., 436 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Marschall v. Water-Boggan International, Inc., 401 So.2d 1157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
489 So. 2d 1239, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1359, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 8365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-dadeland-national-bank-fladistctapp-1986.