Fisher v. CORNELL ENGINEERING
747 N.W.2d 291, 480 Mich. 1188
This text of 747 N.W.2d 291 (Fisher v. CORNELL ENGINEERING) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fisher v. CORNELL ENGINEERING, 747 N.W.2d 291, 480 Mich. 1188 (Mich. 2008).
Opinion
John Robert FISHER and Joann Fisher, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants-Appellants,
v.
CORNELL ENGINEERING, Robert Danielson, Michael Henderson, and Motorcity Muscle, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs, and
D & S Engine Specialists, Inc., Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 18, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
747 N.W.2d 291, 480 Mich. 1188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-cornell-engineering-mich-2008.