Fisher v. Bennett
This text of 21 Misc. 178 (Fisher v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since the amendment of 1893 to section 2718 of the Code of Civil Procedure the referee has power to award costa against an executor on a claim referred and judgment is entered on the report of the referee. Although section 1836 apparently gives power to the court alone to award costs, it must be construed in conjunction with section 2718. Whitcomb v. Whitcomb, 92 Hun, 446; Winne v. Hills, 91 id. 93; Niles v. Crocker, 88 id. 314, 315; Ellis v. Filon, 85 id. 489.
The merits of the original award of costs are not before this court and it must be conceded that those costs were rightly awarded. The case presented shows that it is one of those in which an additional allowance is proper if the plaintiff is entitled to costs at all. An additional allowance of $150 is, therefore, granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Misc. 178, 47 N.Y.S. 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-bennett-nysupct-1897.