Fisher v. Amsel
235 A.D. 824
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1932
StatusPublished
This text of 235 A.D. 824 (Fisher v. Amsel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fisher v. Amsel, 235 A.D. 824 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
(dissenting). I dissent and vote to reverse and grant a new trial, on the ground that plaintiff should not be permitted to recover the balance claimed to be due under the contract. As I view it, the contract was not fully performed. Plaintiff should be limited to a recovery if at all on the basis of a quantum meruit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-amsel-nyappdiv-1932.