Fisher & Son v. Watson
This text of 158 S.E. 584 (Fisher & Son v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exception is to a judgment overruling a motion for a new trial. The proceeding was instituted for the purpose of enjoining the sale of a mare mule under a tax fi. fa. The petitioner insisted that the mule was not subject to the whole of the tax demanded, $12.36, because it also represented the tax on property other than the mule, alleging a willingness to pay the amount of the tax on the animal in question. Held, that under the evidence the court did not err in directing the verdict for the defendant. The special ground ofy the motion for a new trial does not require a reversal, and is not of such character as to require special detailed mention.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 S.E. 584, 172 Ga. 699, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-son-v-watson-ga-1931.