Fisher Scientific Co. v. State
32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 738, 1978 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 166
Opinion
This matter comes before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by Respondent.
Respondent’s motion states as follows:
“1. That the claim herein seeks the recovery of $2,025.00 for the delivery of one electrometer to the Illinois Department of Law Enforcement.
2. That Claimant filed a second claim seeking $2,025.00 for the delivery of one electrometer to the Respondent.
3. That Claimant filed a third claim for $8,100.00, for the delivery of four electrometers. (78 CC 718)
4. That Claimant, in fact, delivered four electrometers to Respondent as alleged in the third complaint. (78 CC 718)
5. That the claim herein duplicates a portion of claim no. 78 CC 718.
6. That Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 37, Sec. 26, (1977) states that there shall be but one satisfaction of any cause of action.
7. That Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 110, Sec. 48(c), (1977) states that another action pending between the same parties for the same cause is a ground for dismissal.”
Motion for dismissal in this cause is hereby granted and said cause dismissed. All the matters contained herein can be disposed of in Case No. 78 CC 718.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fisher Scientific Co. v. State, 32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 738, 1978 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 166 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1978).
32 Ill. Ct. Cl. 738 (Fisher Scientific Co. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.