Fisher Island Holdings, Inc. v. Korman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fisher Island Holdings, Inc. v. Korman

854 So. 2d 288, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13991

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 17, 2003

DocketNos. 3D03-2144

StatusPublished

This text of 854 So. 2d 288 (Fisher Island Holdings, Inc. v. Korman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fisher Island Holdings, Inc. v. Korman, 854 So. 2d 288, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13991 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Fisher Island Holdings, Inc. [Holdings] appeals from a non-final order in favor of Bernard J. Korman, etc. That order extended the voting period for determining Fisher Island Club [Club] members’ approval of Club’s offer to purchase certain unimproved property on Fisher Island. We affirm.

We find, however, that the order entered by the trial court is in the nature of an injunction, and Holdings is entitled to all of the protections of such, including the protection of a bond. We therefore remand with instructions for the trial court to commence proceedings consistent with this opinion, and to enter an order that satisfies all of the requirements of a temporary injunction, in accordance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610, including the requirement of a bond.

Affirmed, but remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Fisher Island Holdings, Inc. [Holdings] appeals from a non-final order in favor of Bernard J. Korman, etc. That order extended the voting period for determining Fisher Island Club [Club] members’ approval of Club’s offer to purchase certain unimproved property on Fisher Island. We affirm.

We find, however, that the order entered by the trial court is in the nature of an injunction, and Holdings is entitled to all of the protections of such, including the protection of a bond. We therefore remand with instructions for the trial court to commence proceedings consistent with this opinion, and to enter an order that satisfies all of the requirements of a temporary injunction, in accordance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610, including the requirement of a bond.

Affirmed, but remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

854 So. 2d 288, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 13991, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-island-holdings-inc-v-korman-fladistctapp-2003.