Fisher (Dale) v. State
This text of Fisher (Dale) v. State (Fisher (Dale) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cruzado v. State, 110 Nev. 745, 747, 879 P.2d 1195, 1195 (1994), overruled on other grounds by Lee v. State, 115 Nev. 207, 985 P.2d 164 (1999). Fisher argues that he merely waived the right to counsel in preparation of a direct appeal or that the language is ambiguous. We disagree, as the language of the agreement clearly states that Fisher unconditionally waived his right to a direct appeal of the conviction. Therefore, we conclude Fisher's claims are waived, and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
J. Hardesty
Douglas
J.
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF
NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A Do>
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fisher (Dale) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-dale-v-state-nev-2014.