Fishell v. Oakwood

Michigan Court of Appeals

Fishell v. Oakwood

167 N.W.2d 798, 16 Mich. App. 267, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1365

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 27, 1969

DocketDocket No. 5,237

StatusPublished

This text of 167 N.W.2d 798 (Fishell v. Oakwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fishell v. Oakwood, 167 N.W.2d 798, 16 Mich. App. 267, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1365 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By this action, plaintiffs sought an injunction to restrain an alleged trespass to land. After trial, this relief was denied on the basis of estoppel, and plaintiffs appeal.

[268]*268A review of tbe trial record convinces this Court that had it sat as trier of the facts, this Court would have reached the same result that the trial court did. The doctrine of estoppel was correctly applied. This conclusion obviates discussion of the other issues briefed.

Affirmed, with costs to defendant city.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By this action, plaintiffs sought an injunction to restrain an alleged trespass to land. After trial, this relief was denied on the basis of estoppel, and plaintiffs appeal.

[268]*268A review of tbe trial record convinces this Court that had it sat as trier of the facts, this Court would have reached the same result that the trial court did. The doctrine of estoppel was correctly applied. This conclusion obviates discussion of the other issues briefed.

Affirmed, with costs to defendant city.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 N.W.2d 798, 16 Mich. App. 267, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fishell-v-oakwood-michctapp-1969.