Fishel v. Weir
This text of 35 Misc. 797 (Fishel v. Weir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The provisions of the statute of Iowa, section 3130, as to “unclaimed property” were not complied with, as appears from the agreed statement of facts. Owners’ whereabouts were unknown; they had been twice requested for instructions regarding the disposition they wished made of the rejected package, and it is admitted that they had no notice of.the amount-of the carrier’s charges due and unpaid as required by this provision. Irrespective of the other questions involved, the sale was unauthorized by law, and the judgment below should be affirmed, with costs.
Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Misc. 797, 72 N.Y.S. 1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fishel-v-weir-nyappterm-1901.