Fishel v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Fishel v. Carpenter

122 S.E.2d 201, 255 N.C. 576, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 637

DecidedNovember 1, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E.2d 201 (Fishel v. Carpenter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fishel v. Carpenter, 122 S.E.2d 201, 255 N.C. 576, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 637 (N.C. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court to submit an issue of plaintiff’s negligence both as a bar to plaintiff’s recovery and as a basis for defendant’s counterclaim. The evidence, however, was insufficient to permit a reasonable inference of plaintiff’s negligence. The assignment of error is not sustained. Reason does not appear why the judgment should be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court to submit an issue of plaintiff’s negligence both as a bar to plaintiff’s recovery and as a basis for defendant’s counterclaim. The evidence, however, was insufficient to permit a reasonable inference of plaintiff’s negligence. The assignment of error is not sustained. Reason does not appear why the judgment should be disturbed.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 S.E.2d 201, 255 N.C. 576, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fishel-v-carpenter-nc-1961.