Fishel, Nessler & Co. v. Fishel

200 F. 1023, 118 C.C.A. 665, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1935
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fishel, Nessler & Co. v. Fishel. Read the opinion of the Court — 204 F. 790
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 20, 1912·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former order of this court, requiring the excluded evidence to be incorporated in the record, will be sufficiently complied with by including in such record a statement of the kind described in rulo 46 of the new rules of practice in equity (198 Fed. xxxi).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fishel, Nessler & Co. v. Fishel, 200 F. 1023, 118 C.C.A. 665, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1935 (2d Cir. 1912).

200 F. 1023 (Fishel, Nessler & Co. v. Fishel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.