Fishback v. Guelich
9 Ill. App. 405, 1881 Ill. App. LEXIS 166
This text of 9 Ill. App. 405 (Fishback v. Guelich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fishback v. Guelich, 9 Ill. App. 405, 1881 Ill. App. LEXIS 166 (Ill. Ct. App. 1881).
Opinion
We cannot say that injustice was done by the verdict, nor that there is such vice in the third instruction as to warrant a reversal for that cause alone.
Ho objection is taken in the brief or argument to the other instructions, and we do not feel called upon to search for defects that are not suggested. The judgment will therefore he affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 Ill. App. 405, 1881 Ill. App. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fishback-v-guelich-illappct-1881.