Fish v. Tischler
This text of 56 A.D.2d 860 (Fish v. Tischler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover a brokerage commission, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered May 3, 1976, which, inter alia, (1) granted the motion of defendants Sol Nissel and Jacob Schonberger to dismiss the complaint as against them and (2) denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Plaintiff failed to demonstrate that he had a cause of action as against defendants Nissel and Schonberger. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 A.D.2d 860, 392 N.Y.S.2d 381, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-tischler-nyappdiv-1977.