Fish v. State

1929 OK CR 291, 279 P. 930, 43 Okla. Crim. 454, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 299
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 20, 1929
DocketNo. A-7300.
StatusPublished

This text of 1929 OK CR 291 (Fish v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fish v. State, 1929 OK CR 291, 279 P. 930, 43 Okla. Crim. 454, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 299 (Okla. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Hughes county of murder, and sentenced to life imprisonment in the state penitentiary.

From the judgment of conviction, defendant appealed to this court. Since the appeal was lodged in this court, and before the final submission of the case, defendant departed this life at the state penitentiary, as satisfactorily appears from a motion on file in this case.

In a criminal prosecution, the purpose of the proceeding being to punish the accused, the action must necessarily abate upon his death, and, where it is made to appear that the plaintiff in error has died pending the determination of his appeal, the case will be abated. It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the. proceedings in the above-entitled cause do abate, with directions to the trial court to enter its appropriate order to that effect.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1929 OK CR 291, 279 P. 930, 43 Okla. Crim. 454, 1929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-state-oklacrimapp-1929.