Fish v. Sheldon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fish v. Sheldon

238 A.D. 889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 238 A.D. 889 (Fish v. Sheldon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fish v. Sheldon, 238 A.D. 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

In action No. 1: Order setting aside verdict reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and verdict of no cause of action reinstated, on the ground that the questions of fact were determinable by the jury, and the court’s attention is not called to any facts which require that the verdict should be set aside in the interests of justice. In action No. 2: Order setting aside verdict reversed, on the law and facts, and verdict of no cause of action reinstated, on the ground that the questions of fact were determinable by the jury, and the court’s attention is not called to any facts which require that the verdict should be set aside in the interests of justice. In action No. 3: Order denying motion to set aside verdict affirmed on stipulation of appellant in open court. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In action No. 1: Order setting aside verdict reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and verdict of no cause of action reinstated, on the ground that the questions of fact were determinable by the jury, and the court’s attention is not called to any facts which require that the verdict should be set aside in the interests of justice. In action No. 2: Order setting aside verdict reversed, on the law and facts, and verdict of no cause of action reinstated, on the ground that the questions of fact were determinable by the jury, and the court’s attention is not called to any facts which require that the verdict should be set aside in the interests of justice. In action No. 3: Order denying motion to set aside verdict affirmed on stipulation of appellant in open court. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Bliss, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fish-v-sheldon-nyappdiv-1933.